Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation

Harnoss, Julian-Camill ; Brune, Laura ; Ansorg, Jörg ; Heidecke, Claus-Dieter ; Assadian, Ojan ; Kramer, Axel

In: BMC Infectious Diseases, 14 (2014), Nr. 315. pp. 1-7. ISSN 1471-2334

[thumbnail of 12879_2013_Article_4187.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (366kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragPractice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation by Harnoss, Julian-Camill ; Brune, Laura ; Ansorg, Jörg ; Heidecke, Claus-Dieter ; Assadian, Ojan ; Kramer, Axel underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: Surgical hand rub and healthy skin are basic requirements to prevent surgical site infections. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the current practice of skin protection and/or skin care products (SP/SC) using among surgeons as well as a lack of data pertaining to the influence of SP/SC on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. Methods: A 10 weeks-survey among German surgeons as well as an experimental crossover study involving 26 participants were conducted. The immediate and sustainable efficacy (IE/SE) of surgical hand rub and participants’ hand moisture were measured after an 8-day usage of SP/SC, as well as the influence on micro-perforations on surgical gloves. Results: The questionnaire was available to 16,000 German surgeons. Thereof, 1,771 surgeons accessed the questionnaire, representing a total participation rate of 11%. As 19% (n = 338) of questionnaires were incomplete, a total of 1,433 completed questionnaires were available for further analysis. More than 75% of the participants stated not to use any SP/SC, yet, almost 50% suffered from skin irritation or discomfort. Only 5% used SP/SC at the beginning of their shift. 10% refused to use SP/SC because of concerns that SP/SC may reduce the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. After usage of SP/SC over 8-days, skin moisture was significantly higher (P < 0.001), whereas no significant influence on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub was observed (IE: P = 0.135; SP: P = 0.681). Micro-perforations were detected in 8/52 surgical gloves (15%), with no statistical significant difference between SP/SC users (n = 2/26; 8%) and non-users (n = 6/26; 23%; P = 0.249). Conclusions: Following the results of this largest questionnaire base survey among German surgeons on skin care, there is a need to educate and inform surgeons on the correct application and the concept of SP/SC strategies. In the present study, the combination of selected SP/SC products and one alcohol-based hand rub formulation did not show a negative interaction with surgical hand rub or surgical glove perforation. However, it is advisable to ascertain the compatibility of SP/SC products with the used hand disinfectant prior to purchase.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Infectious Diseases
Volume: 14
Number: 315
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 22 Dec 2015 09:53
Date: 2014
ISSN: 1471-2334
Page Range: pp. 1-7
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Chirurgische Universitätsklinik
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative