Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Measuring health workers’ motivation composition: validation of a scale based on Self-Determination Theory in Burkina Faso

Lohmann, Julia ; Souares, Aurélia ; Tiendrebéogo, Justin ; Houlfort, Nathalie ; Robyn, Paul Jacob ; Somda, Serge M. A. ; De Allegri, Manuela

In: Human Resources for Health, 15 (2017), Nr. 33. pp. 1-12. ISSN 1478-4491

[thumbnail of 12960_2017_Article_208.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (670kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragMeasuring health workers’ motivation composition: validation of a scale based on Self-Determination Theory in Burkina Faso by Lohmann, Julia ; Souares, Aurélia ; Tiendrebéogo, Justin ; Houlfort, Nathalie ; Robyn, Paul Jacob ; Somda, Serge M. A. ; De Allegri, Manuela underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: Although motivation of health workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has become a topic of increasing interest by policy makers and researchers in recent years, many aspects are not well understood to date. This is partly due to a lack of appropriate measurement instruments. This article presents evidence on the construct validity of a psychometric scale developed to measure motivation composition, i.e., the extent to which motivation of different origin within and outside of a person contributes to their overall work motivation. It is theoretically grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1142 nurses in 522 government health facilities in 24 districts of Burkina Faso. We assessed the scale’s validity in a confirmatory factor analysis framework, investigating whether the scale measures what it was intended to measure (content, structural, and convergent/discriminant validity) and whether it does so equally well across health worker subgroups (measurement invariance). Results: Our results show that the scale measures a slightly modified version of the SDT continuum of motivation well. Measurements were overall comparable between subgroups, but results indicate that caution is warranted if a comparison of motivation scores between groups is the focus of analysis. Conclusions: The scale is a valuable addition to the repository of measurement tools for health worker motivation in LMICs. We expect it to prove useful in the quest for a more comprehensive understanding of motivation as well as of the effects and potential side effects of interventions intended to enhance motivation.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Human Resources for Health
Volume: 15
Number: 33
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 29 May 2017 09:30
Date: 2017
ISSN: 1478-4491
Page Range: pp. 1-12
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Institut für Public Health (IPH)
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative