Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation

Brinster, Regina ; Köttgen, Anna ; Tayo, Bamidele O. ; Schumacher, Martin ; Sekula, Peggy

In: BMC Bioinformatics, 19 (2018), Nr. 78. pp. 1-10. ISSN 1471-2105

[thumbnail of 12859_2018_Article_2081.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (1MB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragControl procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation by Brinster, Regina ; Köttgen, Anna ; Tayo, Bamidele O. ; Schumacher, Martin ; Sekula, Peggy underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: When many (up to millions) of statistical tests are conducted in discovery set analyses such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS), approaches controlling family-wise error rate (FWER) or false discovery rate (FDR) are required to reduce the number of false positive decisions. Some methods were specifically developed in the context of high-dimensional settings and partially rely on the estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses. However, these approaches are also applied in low-dimensional settings such as replication set analyses that might be restricted to a small number of specific hypotheses. The aim of this study was to compare different approaches in low-dimensional settings using (a) real data from the CKDGen Consortium and (b) a simulation study.

Results: In both application and simulation FWER approaches were less powerful compared to FDR control methods, whether a larger number of hypotheses were tested or not. Most powerful was the q-value method. However, the specificity of this method to maintain true null hypotheses was especially decreased when the number of tested hypotheses was small. In this low-dimensional situation, estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses was biased.

Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of a sizeable data set for a reliable estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses. Consequently, methods relying on this estimation should only be applied in high-dimensional settings. Furthermore, if the focus lies on testing of a small number of hypotheses such as in replication settings, FWER methods rather than FDR methods should be preferred to maintain high specificity.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Bioinformatics
Volume: 19
Number: 78
Publisher: BioMed Central ; Springer
Place of Publication: London ; Berlin ; Heidelberg
Date Deposited: 18 Apr 2018 08:35
Date: 2018
ISSN: 1471-2105
Page Range: pp. 1-10
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Informatik
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative