Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Correcting versus resolving respiratory motion in free-breathing whole-heart MRA: a comparison in patients with thoracic aortic disease

Stroud, Robert E. ; Piccini, Davide ; Schoepf, U. Joseph ; Heerfordt, John ; Yerly, Jérôme ; Di Sopra, Lorenzo ; Rollins, Jonathan D. ; Fischer, Andreas M. ; Suranyi, Pal ; Varga-Szemes, Akos

In: European Radiology Experimental, 3 (2019), Nr. 29. pp. 1-8. ISSN 2509-9280

[thumbnail of 41747_2019_Article_107.pdf] PDF, English - main document
Download (1MB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragCorrecting versus resolving respiratory motion in free-breathing whole-heart MRA: a comparison in patients with thoracic aortic disease by Stroud, Robert E. ; Piccini, Davide ; Schoepf, U. Joseph ; Heerfordt, John ; Yerly, Jérôme ; Di Sopra, Lorenzo ; Rollins, Jonathan D. ; Fischer, Andreas M. ; Suranyi, Pal ; Varga-Szemes, Akos underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: Whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) requires sophisticated methods accounting for respiratory motion. Our purpose was to evaluate the image quality of compressed sensing-based respiratory motion-resolved three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart MRA compared with self-navigated motion-corrected whole-heart MRA in patients with known thoracic aorta dilation.

Methods: Twenty-five patients were prospectively enrolled in this ethically approved study. Whole-heart 1.5-T MRA was acquired using a prototype 3D radial steady-state free-precession free-breathing sequence. The same data were reconstructed with a one-dimensional motion-correction algorithm (1D-MCA) and an extradimensional golden-angle radial sparse parallel reconstruction (XD-GRASP). Subjective image quality was scored and objective image quality was quantified (signal intensity ratio, SIR; vessel sharpness). Wilcoxon, McNemar, and paired t tests were used.

Results: Subjective image quality was significantly higher using XD-GRASP compared to 1D-MCA (median 4.5, interquartile range 4.5–5.0 versus 4.0 [2.25–4.75]; p < 0.001), as well as signal homogeneity (3.0 [3.0–3.0] versus 2.0 [2.0–3.0]; p = 0.003), and image sharpness (3.0 [2.0–3.0] vs 2.0 [1.25–3.0]; p < 0.001). SIR with the 1D-MCA and XD-GRASP was 6.1 ± 3.9 versus 7.4 ± 2.5, respectively (p < 0.001); while signal homogeneity was 274.2 ± 265.0 versus 199.8 ± 67.2 (p = 0.129). XD-GRASP provided a higher vessel sharpness (45.3 ± 10.7 versus 40.6 ± 101, p = 0.025).

Conclusions: XD-GRASP-based motion-resolved reconstruction of free-breathing 3D whole-heart MRA datasets provides improved image contrast, sharpness, and signal homogeneity and seems to be a promising technique that overcomes some of the limitations of motion correction or respiratory navigator gating.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: European Radiology Experimental
Volume: 3
Number: 29
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Place of Publication: Cham
Date Deposited: 20 Aug 2019 14:18
Date: 2019
ISSN: 2509-9280
Page Range: pp. 1-8
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim > Institut für Klinische Radiologie
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords: Aorta, Dilatation, Image processing (computer–assisted), Magnetic resonance angiography, Motion
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative