In: Contrastive Pragmatics, Leiden (2022), pp. 1-32. ISSN 2666-0385 (Druck-Ausg.); 2666-0393 (Online-Ausg.)
Preview |
PDF, English
- main document
Download (588kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
Abstract
The planners uh and um fulfil a range of interpersonal and discursive functions, akin to other pragmatic markers. Although there appear to be differences between the planners’ functions across genres, the factors influencing these differences have not been analysed comprehensively so far. In our study, we analyse the frequency and functions of uh and um across three different genres: spontaneous conversation, scripted dialogues in television series and dialogues in improvised theatre. Our findings suggest that both the fictional nature of a text and its degree of composition have an influence on the planners’ functions. Our results confirm that planners are indeed pragmatic markers which serve a range of textual and interpersonal functions, and that the frequency and functions of planners are affected by factors relating to the context of language production, which include spontaneity as well as the content and function of a text
Document type: | Article |
---|---|
Journal or Publication Title: | Contrastive Pragmatics |
Publisher: | Brill |
Place of Publication: | Leiden |
Edition: | Zweitveröffentlichung |
Date Deposited: | 16 Mar 2023 13:36 |
Date: | 2022 |
ISSN: | 2666-0385 (Druck-Ausg.); 2666-0393 (Online-Ausg.) |
Page Range: | pp. 1-32 |
Faculties / Institutes: | Neuphilologische Fakultät > Anglistisches Seminar |
DDC-classification: | 400 Linguistics 420 English |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | fiction, spoken language, hesitation markers, improvisation, telecinematic discourse |
Additional Information: | (published online ahead of print 2022) Online-Publikationsdatum: 09 Jun 2022 |