Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Häfner, Matthias F. ; Sterzing, Florian ; Krug, David ; Körber, Stefan A. ; Jäkel, Oliver ; Debus, Jürgen ; Härtig, Martin M.

In: Radiation Oncology, 11 (2016), Nr. 150. pp. 1-9. ISSN 1748-717X

[thumbnail of 13014_2016_Article_727.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (1MB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragIntrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer by Häfner, Matthias F. ; Sterzing, Florian ; Krug, David ; Körber, Stefan A. ; Jäkel, Oliver ; Debus, Jürgen ; Härtig, Martin M. underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: In carbon ion radiotherapy (CIR) for esophageal cancer, organ and target motion is a major challenge for treatment planning due to potential range deviations. This study intends to analyze the impact of intrafractional variations on dosimetric parameters and to identify favourable settings for robust treatment plans. Methods: We contoured esophageal boost volumes in different organ localizations for four patients and calculated CIR-plans with 13 different beam geometries on a free-breathing CT. Forward calculation of these plans was performed on 4D-CT datasets representing seven different phases of the breathing cycle. Plan quality was assessed for each patient and beam configuration. Results: Target volume coverage was adequate for all settings in the baseline CIR-plans (V95 > 98% for two-beam geometries, > 94% for one-beam geometries), but reduced on 4D-CT plans (V95 range 50–95%). Sparing of the organs at risk (OAR) was adequate, but range deviations during the breathing cycle partly caused critical, maximum doses to spinal cord up to 3.5x higher than expected. There was at least one beam configuration for each patient with appropriate plan quality. Conclusions: Despite intrafractional motion, CIR for esophageal cancer is possible with robust treatment plans when an individually optimized beam setup is selected depending on tumor size and localization.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Radiation Oncology
Volume: 11
Number: 150
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 16 Nov 2016 14:06
Date: 2016
ISSN: 1748-717X
Page Range: pp. 1-9
Faculties / Institutes: Service facilities > German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Radiologische Universitätsklinik
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative