%0 Generic
%A Martschat, Sebastian
%D 2017
%F heidok:23305
%R 10.11588/heidok.00023305
%T Structured Representations for Coreference Resolution
%U https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/23305/
%X Coreference resolution is the task of determining which expressions in a text are used to refer to the same entity. This task is one of the most fundamental problems of natural language understanding. Inherently, coreference resolution is a structured task, as the output consists of sets of coreferring expressions. This complex structure poses several challenges since it is not clear how to account for the structure in terms of error analysis and representation.    In this thesis, we present a treatment of computational coreference resolution that accounts for the structure. Our treatment encompasses error analysis and the representation of approaches to coreference resolution. In particular, we propose two frameworks in this thesis.    The first framework deals with error analysis. We gather requirements for an appropriate error analysis method and devise a framework that considers a structured graph-based representation of the reference annotation and the system output. Error extraction is performed by constructing linguistically motivated or data-driven spanning trees for the graph-based coreference representations.     The second framework concerns the representation of approaches to coreference resolution. We show that approaches to coreference resolution can be understood as predictors of latent structures that are not annotated in the data. From these latent structures, the final output is derived during a post-processing step. We devise a machine learning framework for coreference resolution based on this insight. In this framework, we have a unified representation of approaches to coreference resolution. Individual approaches can be expressed as instantiations of a generic approach. We express many approaches from the literature as well as novel variants in our framework, ranging from simple pairwise classification approaches to complex entity-centric models. Using the uniform representation, we are able to analyze differences and similarities between the models transparently and in detail.    Finally, we employ the error analysis framework to perform a qualitative analysis of differences in error profiles of the models on a benchmark dataset. We trace back differences in the error profiles to differences in the representation. Our analysis shows that a mention ranking model and a tree-based mention-entity model with left-to-right inference have the highest performance. We discuss reasons for the improved performance and analyze why more advanced approaches modeled in our framework cannot improve on these models. An implementation of the frameworks discussed in this thesis is publicly available.