TY  - GEN
UR  - https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/27276/
EP  - 15
A1  - Oechssler, Jörg
A1  - Roomets, Alex
N2  - The Savage and the Anscombe-Aumann frameworks are the two most popular approaches used when modeling ambiguity. The former is more flexible, but the latter is often preferred for its simplicity. We conduct an experiment where subjects place bets on the joint outcome of an ambiguous urn and a fair coin. We document that more than a third of our subjects make choices that are incompatible with Anscombe-Aumann for any preferences, while the Savage framework is flexible enough to accountfor subjects' behaviors.
T3  - Discussion Paper Series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics
Y1  - 2019/10//
TI  - Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: An experimental
investigation of ambiguity frameworks
CY  - Heidelberg
AV  - public
KW  - Ellsberg paradox
KW  -  ambiguity
KW  -  experiment
ID  - heidok27276
ER  -