TY  - GEN
AV  - public
CY  - Heidelberg
TI  - Subsidizing Unit Donations: Matches, Rebates, and Discounts Compared
T3  - Discussion Paper Series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics
Y1  - 2020/12//
ID  - heidok29236
KW  - charitable giving
KW  -  unit donation
KW  -  online field experiment
KW  -  subsidies
KW  -  framing
A1  - Diederich, Johannes
A1  - Eckel, Catherine C.
A1  - Epperson, Raphael
A1  - Goeschl, Timo
A1  - Grossman, Philip J.
EP  - 55
UR  - https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/29236/
N2  - An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate rebate subsidies in raising funds. We investigate whether this result extends to ?unit donation? schemes, a popular alternative form of soliciting donations. There, the donors? choices are about the number of units of a charitable good to fund at a given unit price, rather than the amount of money to give. Comparing matches and rebates as well as simple discounts on the unit price, we find no evidence of dominance in our online experiment: The three subsidy types are equally effective overall. At a more disaggregate level, rebates lead to a higher likelihood of giving while matching and discount subsidies lead to larger donations by donors. This suggests that charities using a unit donation scheme enjoy additional degrees of freedom in choosing a subsidy type. Rebates merit additional consideration if the primary goal is to attract donors.
ER  -