<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . "Information Sampling in Impression Formation Tasks"^^ . "All three papers included in this thesis, rely on an exemplar trait-impression formation\r\nparadigm (Asch, 1946), but throughout each paper different theoretically important\r\naspects of the sampling task are analyzed. Prager, Krueger and Fiedler (2018) elaborate\r\na possible solution to the \"less-is-more\" debate, that is the question whether more\r\ninformation leads to more or less extreme judgments. The correlation between sample\r\nsize and how amplified judgments are depends crucially on how the respective sample\r\nwas stopped. When sample size was experimenter-determined (random), judgments\r\ntended to be more conservative for small than for large samples. In contrast, judgments\r\non small samples were polarized for self-truncated sampling (i.e. when the judging\r\nparticipants can themselves decide on when to stop the sampling sequence). Prager\r\nand Fiedler (2021b) transferred the self-truncation principle to an inter-group context,\r\nwhere impression targets were groups rather than individuals. By assessing perceived\r\nwithin-group homogeneity in addition to the likeability judgment, we could demonstrate\r\nthat perceived homogeneity is part of the self-truncation principle: Early truncated\r\nsamples are not only more polarized but also more homogeneous than samples that\r\nare expanded further. Given that out-groups are associated with smaller information\r\nsamples, these self-truncation effects might constitute a sufficient explanation of outgroup\r\nhomogeneity and out-group polarization.\r\nIn Prager et al. (2018) and Prager and Fiedler (2021a) we apply different versions\r\nof a yoked controls design: Whereas a primary participant engages in self-truncated\r\nsampling, a secondary yoked control receives exactly the same samples passively. This\r\nprocedure results in regression: Small samples are perceived less polarized for the yoked\r\ncontrol than for the primary self-truncating participant. This difference is an exclusive\r\nresult of different cognitive processing of the sampling input, since the yoked controls\r\ndesign keeps the sampling input itself identical.\r\nAll three papers analyze the impact of diagnosticity: Especially negative and extreme\r\ninformation is more diagnostic than positive and moderate input. Highly diagnostic\r\ninput results in earlier truncation and more polarized judgment. The diagnosticity\r\nconcept is further elaborated by considering multi-dimensional density in Prager\r\nand Fiedler (2021b)."^^ . "2022" . . . . . . . "Johannes"^^ . "Prager"^^ . "Johannes Prager"^^ . . . . . . "Information Sampling in Impression Formation Tasks (PDF)"^^ . . . "Information_Sampling_in_Impression_Formation_Tasks.pdf"^^ . . . "Information Sampling in Impression Formation Tasks (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "indexcodes.txt"^^ . . . "Information Sampling in Impression Formation Tasks (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "Information Sampling in Impression Formation Tasks (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "Information Sampling in Impression Formation Tasks (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "Information Sampling in Impression Formation Tasks (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . "HTML Summary of #31799 \n\nInformation Sampling in Impression Formation Tasks\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "150 Psychologie"@de . "150 Psychology"@en . .