Direkt zum Inhalt
  1. Publizieren |
  2. Suche |
  3. Browsen |
  4. Neuzugänge rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Rechtsfragen |
  7. EnglishCookie löschen - von nun an wird die Spracheinstellung Ihres Browsers verwendet.

Treatment decisions, clinical outcomes, and pharmacoeconomics in the treatment of patients with EGFR mutated stage III/IV NSCLC in Germany: an observational study

Schuette, Wolfgang ; Schirmacher, Peter ; Eberhardt, Wilfried E. E. ; Dietel, Manfred ; Zirrgiebel, Ute ; Muehlenhoff, Lars ; Thomas, Michael

In: BMC Cancer, 18 (2018), Nr. 135. S. 1-10. ISSN 1471-2407

[thumbnail of 12885_2018_Article_4032.pdf]
Vorschau
PDF, Englisch
Download (875kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragTreatment decisions, clinical outcomes, and pharmacoeconomics in the treatment of patients with EGFR mutated stage III/IV NSCLC in Germany: an observational study von Schuette, Wolfgang ; Schirmacher, Peter ; Eberhardt, Wilfried E. E. ; Dietel, Manfred ; Zirrgiebel, Ute ; Muehlenhoff, Lars ; Thomas, Michael steht unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0

Zitieren von Dokumenten: Bitte verwenden Sie für Zitate nicht die URL in der Adresszeile Ihres Webbrowsers, sondern entweder die angegebene DOI, URN oder die persistente URL, deren langfristige Verfügbarkeit wir garantieren. [mehr ...]

Abstract

Background: We evaluated treatment decisions and outcomes in a cohort of predominately Caucasian patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFR Mut+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: REASON (NCT00997230) was a non-interventional study in German patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Secondary endpoints for EGFR Mut + NSCLC included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse event (AE) management, and pharmacoeconomic outcomes.

Results: Among 334 patients with EGFR Mut + NSCLC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were the most common first-line therapy (56.6%, 53.0% gefitinib). Among patients who received TKIs/gefitinib before first disease progression, PFS was longer compared with those who did not receive a TKI (median 10.1/10.0 vs. 7.0 months; HR 0.67/0.69; log-rank p = 0.012/p = 0.022). OS was longer for those patients who ever received a TKI/gefitinib during their complete therapy course compared with those who never received a TKI (median 18.4/18.1 vs. 13.6 months; HR 0.53/0.55; p = 0.003/p = 0.005). Total mean first-line treatment healthcare costs per person were higher for those receiving TKIs (€46,443) compared with those who received chemotherapy (€27,182). Mean outpatient and inpatient costs were highest with chemotherapy. Rash, diarrhea, and dry skin were the most commonly reported AEs for patients receiving gefitinib.

Conclusions: In REASON, TKI therapy was the most common first- and second-line treatment for EGFR Mut + NSCLC, associated with increased drug costs compared with chemotherapy. Patients who received gefitinib or a TKI ever during their complete therapy course had prolonged PFS and OS compared with patients who did not receive a TKI.

Trial registration: The trial was registered on October, 2009 with ClinicalTrials.gov : https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00997230?term=NCT00997230&rank=1

Dokumententyp: Artikel
Titel der Zeitschrift: BMC Cancer
Band: 18
Nummer: 135
Verlag: BioMed Central ; Springer
Ort der Veröffentlichung: London ; Berlin ; Heidelberg
Erstellungsdatum: 24 Apr. 2018 07:51
Erscheinungsjahr: 2018
ISSN: 1471-2407
Seitenbereich: S. 1-10
Institute/Einrichtungen: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg und Uniklinikum > Pathologisches Institut
Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg und Uniklinikum > Thoraxklinik Heidelberg gGmbH
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin
Leitlinien | Häufige Fragen | Kontakt | Impressum |
OA-LogoDINI-Zertifikat 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative