Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Is MRCP necessary to diagnose pancreas divisum?

Bogveradze, Nino ; Hasse, Felix ; Mayer, Philipp ; Rupp, Christian ; Tjaden, Christin ; Klauss, Miriam ; Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich ; Weber, Tim Frederik

In: BMC Medical Imaging, 19 (2019), Nr. 33. pp. 1-7. ISSN 1471-2342

[thumbnail of 12880_2019_Article_329.pdf] PDF, English - main document
Download (2MB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragIs MRCP necessary to diagnose pancreas divisum? by Bogveradze, Nino ; Hasse, Felix ; Mayer, Philipp ; Rupp, Christian ; Tjaden, Christin ; Klauss, Miriam ; Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich ; Weber, Tim Frederik underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (3D-MRCP) with non-MRCP T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for diagnosis of pancreas divisum (PD).

Methods: This is a retrospective study of 342 consecutive patients with abdominal MRI including 3D-MRCP. 3D-MRCP was a coronal respiration-navigated T2-weighted sequence with 1.5 mm slice thickness. Non-MRCP T2-weighted sequences were (1) a coronal inversion recovery sequence (TIRM) with 6 mm slice thickness and (2) a transverse single shot turbo spin echo sequence (HASTE) with 4 mm slice thickness. For 3D-MRCP, TIRM, and HASTE, presence of PD and assessment of evaluability were determined in a randomized manner. A consensus read by two radiologists using 3D-MRCP, non-MRCP T2-weighted sequences, and other available imaging sequences served as reference standard for diagnosis of PD. Statistical analysis included performance analysis of 3D-MRCP, TIRM, and HASTE and testing for noninferiority of non-MRCP T2-weighted sequences compared with 3D-MRCP.

Results: Thirty-three of 342 patients (9.7%) were diagnosed with PD using the reference standard. Sensitivity/specificity of 3D-MRCP for detecting PD were 81.2%/69.7% (p < 0.001). Sensitivity/specificity of TIRM and HASTE were 92.5%/93.9 and 98.1%/97.0%, respectively (p < 0.001 each). Grouped sensitivity/specificity of non-MRCP T2-weighted sequences were 99.8%/91.0%. Non-MRCP T2-weighted sequences were non-inferior to 3D-MRCP alone for diagnosis of PD. 20.2, 7.3%, and 2.3% of 3D-MRCP, TIRM, and HASTE, respectively, were not evaluable due to motion artifacts or insufficient duct depiction.

Conclusions: Non-MRCP T2-weighted MRI sequences offer high performance for diagnosis of PD and are noninferior to 3D-MRCP alone.

Trial registration Not applicable.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Medical Imaging
Volume: 19
Number: 33
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 24 Jul 2019 14:03
Date: 2019
ISSN: 1471-2342
Page Range: pp. 1-7
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Medizinische Universitäts-Klinik und Poliklinik
Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Radiologische Universitätsklinik
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords: MRI, MRCP, TIRM, HASTE, Pancreas divisum
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative