In: Kant-Studien, 114 (2023), Nr. 2. pp. 185-206. ISSN 0022-8877 (Druck-Ausg.); 1613-1134 (Online-Ausg.)
Preview |
PDF, German
- main document
Download (246kB) | Terms of use |
Abstract
In multiple parts of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant describes how time is dependent on space – which is the fundament of his distinction between inner and outer sense. However, he does not provide us with an argument for this dependency. In this article, two reasons for this dependency thesis are introduced. The first one aims at providing a conceptual link between time and space but runs into conflict with the Transcendental Aesthetic. The second one shifts our focus from the conceptual level to a priori possible objects of experience: Time cannot provide such objects, which are different from our subjective states due to its one-dimensionality. Only space makes such objects possible.
| Document type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | Kant-Studien |
| Volume: | 114 |
| Number: | 2 |
| Publisher: | de Gruyter |
| Place of Publication: | Berlin |
| Edition: | Zweitveröffentlichung |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Jun 2023 08:58 |
| Date: | 2023 |
| ISSN: | 0022-8877 (Druck-Ausg.); 1613-1134 (Online-Ausg.) |
| Page Range: | pp. 185-206 |
| Faculties / Institutes: | Philosophische Fakultät > Philosophisches Seminar |
| DDC-classification: | 100 Philosophy |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | time; space; b-deduction; refutation of idealism; transcendental aesthetic |
| Additional Information: | Dieser Beitrag ist aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich. *** This publication is freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively. |
