Direkt zum Inhalt
  1. Publizieren |
  2. Suche |
  3. Browsen |
  4. Neuzugänge rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Rechtsfragen |
  7. EnglishCookie löschen - von nun an wird die Spracheinstellung Ihres Browsers verwendet.

Does neurofeedback training normalize reward-processing in ADHD? An ERP study

Peters, Szarah

[thumbnail of Dissertation_Peters_pdf.pdf]
Vorschau
PDF, Englisch
Download (1MB) | Nutzungsbedingungen

Zitieren von Dokumenten: Bitte verwenden Sie für Zitate nicht die URL in der Adresszeile Ihres Webbrowsers, sondern entweder die angegebene DOI, URN oder die persistente URL, deren langfristige Verfügbarkeit wir garantieren. [mehr ...]

Abstract

Altered reward processing has been discussed as a core deficit in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder that has been increasingly investigated in the past years. Compared to healthy subjects, patients affected by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder showed reduced amplitudes of the Cue-P3 and the contingent negative variation; two event-related potentials that have been associated with reward anticipation on a neurophysiological level. Within a randomized controlled trial design, the current study investigated the effects of slow cortical potential neurofeedback on these neurophysiological indices during reward anticipation. Therefore, 14 children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (mean age 11.6 years) were randomly assigned to either neurofeedback or electromyogram-biofeedback training as an active control condition and received 20 training sessions, each. EEG-data were recorded before and after treatment, while the participants where performing a monetary incentive delay task. After treatment, children who received neurofeedback showed reduced symptom scores in the clinical assessment. No neurophysiological changes were observed after neurofeedback or electromyogram treatment. Interestingly, when only focusing on pretreatment assessment, medicated patients showed a significantly increased contingent negative variation amplitude in the win condition compared to unmedicated patients. After training compared to before training, they showed a less negative contingent negative variation and a reduced CueP3 amplitude. In contrast, unmedicated patients showed an increased contingent negative variation and CueP3 amplitude after the training. These results suggest no specific effect of neurofeedback on reward anticipation, but point to an interaction between neurofeedback and stimulant medication. On a neurophysiological level, non-medicated patients seem to benefit more from training than medicated patients. Thus, this first study exploring the effects of neurofeedback on reward anticipation on a neurophysiological level in children suffering from Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder offers important preliminary insights in mechanisms of action. Nonetheless, further larger studies are needed to validate these results and to explore in more detail the interaction effects of medication and neurofeedback.

Dokumententyp: Dissertation
Erstgutachter: Banaschewski, Prof. Dr. Dr. Tobias
Ort der Veröffentlichung: Heidelberg
Tag der Prüfung: 4 August 2021
Erstellungsdatum: 12 Okt. 2021 12:23
Erscheinungsjahr: 2021
Institute/Einrichtungen: Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim > Dekanat Medizin Mannheim
Zentrale und Sonstige Einrichtungen > Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit
DDC-Sachgruppe: 150 Psychologie
610 Medizin
Normierte Schlagwörter: Elektroencephalographie, Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-Syndrom, Neurofeedback
Leitlinien | Häufige Fragen | Kontakt | Impressum |
OA-LogoDINI-Zertifikat 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative