|
PDF, English
Terms of use / Nutzungsbedingungen Download (1935Kb) |
Abstract
Advice is important for decision making, especially in the financial sector. We investigate how individuals assess risk preferences of others given sociodemographic information or pictures. Both non-professionals and fi nancial professionals participate in this artefactual field experiment. Subjects mainly rely on the other's self-assessment of risk preferences and on gender when forming the belief about someone else's risk preferences. On average, subjects consider themselves to be more risk-tolerant than the person they evaluate. Subjects use their own risk attitude as a reference point for predicting others' risk preferences. This false consensus eff ect is less pronounced for young professionals than for senior and non-professionals. Furthermore, financial professionals predict risk preferences more accurately compared to non-professionals.
| Item Type: | Working paper |
|---|---|
| Date: | 2012 |
| Faculties / Institutes: | The Faculty of Economics and Social Studies > Alfred-Weber-Institut for Economics |
| Subjects: | 330 Economics |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Risk Preferences , Financial Advice , Artefactual Field Experiment , Behavioral Finance |
| Schriftenreihe ID: | Discussion Paper Series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics |






