Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Characteristics and determinants of knowledge transfer policies at universities and public institutions in medical research — protocol for a systematic review of the qualitative research literature

Jahn, Rosa ; Müller, Olaf ; Bozorgmehr, Kayvan

In: Systematic Reviews, 4 (2015), Nr. 110. pp. 1-5. ISSN 2046-4053

PDF, English
Download (370kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragCharacteristics and determinants of knowledge transfer policies at universities and public institutions in medical research — protocol for a systematic review of the qualitative research literature by Jahn, Rosa ; Müller, Olaf ; Bozorgmehr, Kayvan underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.


Background: Universities, public institutions, and the transfer of knowledge to the private sector play a major role in the development of medical technologies. The decisions of universities and public institutions regarding the transfer of knowledge impact the accessibility of the final product, making it easier or more difficult for consumers to access these products. In the case of medical research, these products are pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, or medical procedures. The ethical dimension of access to these potentially lifesaving products is apparent and distinguishes the transfer of medical knowledge from the transfer of knowledge in other areas. While the general field of technology transfer from academic and public to private actors is attracting an increasing amount of scholarly attention, the specifications of knowledge transfer in the medical field are not as well explored. This review seeks to provide a systematic overview and analysis of the qualitative literature on the characteristics and determinants of knowledge transfer in medical research and development. Methods: The review systematically searches the literature for qualitative studies that focus on knowledge transfer characteristics and determinants at medical academic and public research institutions. It aims at identifying and analyzing the literature on the content and context of knowledge transfer policies, decision-making processes, and actors at academic and public institutions. The search strategy includes the databases PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, and DiVa. These databases will be searched based on pre-specified search terms. The studies selected for inclusion in the review will be critically assessed for their quality utilizing the Qualitative Research Checklist developed by the Clinical Appraisal Skills Programme. Data extraction and synthesis will be based on the meta-ethnographic approach. Discussion: This review seeks to further the understanding of the kinds of transfer pathways that exist in medical knowledge transfer as well as what factors lead to the adoption of one pathway over another. The aim is to provide evidence for political and academic actors designing policies for the translation of medical knowledge and public-private cooperation. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42015014241

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Systematic Reviews
Volume: 4
Number: 110
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 14 Jan 2016 09:53
Date: 2015
ISSN: 2046-4053
Page Range: pp. 1-5
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Medizinische Universitäts-Klinik und Poliklinik
Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Institut für Public Health (IPH)
Subjects: 300 Social sciences
610 Medical sciences Medicine
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative