Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Validating the Demand Control Support Questionnaire among white-collar employees in Switzerland and the United States

Mauss, Daniel ; Herr, Raphael M. ; Theorell, Töres ; Angerer, Peter ; Li, Jian

In: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 13 (2018), Nr. 7. pp. 1-7. ISSN 1745-6673

[thumbnail of 12995_2018_Article_188.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (421kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragValidating the Demand Control Support Questionnaire among white-collar employees in Switzerland and the United States by Mauss, Daniel ; Herr, Raphael M. ; Theorell, Töres ; Angerer, Peter ; Li, Jian underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: The Demand Control Support Questionnaire (DCSQ) is an established self-reported tool to measure a stressful work environment. Validated German and English versions are however currently missing. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the psychometric properties of German and English versions of the DCSQ among white-collar employees in Switzerland and the US.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 499 employees in Switzerland and 411 in the US, respectively. The 17-item DCSQ with three scales assessed psychosocial stress at work (psychological demands, decision latitude, and social support at work). Depressive symptoms were measured by the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Cronbach’s α and item-total correlations tested the scale reliability (internal consistency). Construct validity of the questionnaire was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Logistic regressions estimated associations of each scale and job strain with depressive symptoms (criterion validity).

Results: In both samples, all DCSQ scales presented satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.72; item-total correlations ≥ 0.33), and EFA showed the 17 items loading on three factors, which is in line with the theoretically assumed structure of the DCSQ construct. Moreover, all three scales as well as high job strain were significantly associated with depressive symptoms. The associations were stronger in the US sample.

Conclusions: The German and the English versions of the DCSQ seem to be reliable and valid instruments to measure psychosocial stress based on the job demand-control-support model in the workplace of white-collar employees in Switzerland and the US.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Volume: 13
Number: 7
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 27 Apr 2018 11:54
Date: 2018
ISSN: 1745-6673
Page Range: pp. 1-7
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Institut für Public Health (IPH)
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative