Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams

Mauti, Joy ; Gautier, Lara ; Neve, Jan-Walter ; Beiersmann, Claudia ; Tosun, Jale ; Jahn, Albrecht

In: Health Research Policy and Systems, 17 (2019), Nr. 15. pp. 1-12. ISSN 1478-4505

[thumbnail of 12961_2019_Article_416.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English - main document
Download (689kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragKenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams by Mauti, Joy ; Gautier, Lara ; Neve, Jan-Walter ; Beiersmann, Claudia ; Tosun, Jale ; Jahn, Albrecht underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: Health in All Policies (HiAP) is an intersectoral approach that facilitates decision-making among policy-makers to maximise positive health impacts of other public policies. Kenya, as a member of WHO, has committed to adopting HiAP, which has been included in the Kenya Health Policy for the period 2014–2030. This study aims to assess the extent to which this commitment is being translated into the process of governmental policy-making and supported by international development partners as well as non-state actors.

Methods: To examine HiAP in Kenya, a qualitative case study was performed, including a review of relevant policy documents. Furthermore, 40 key informants with diverse backgrounds (government, UN agencies, development agencies, civil society) were interviewed. Analysis was carried out using the main dimensions of Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach (problems, policy, politics).

Results: Kenya is facing major health challenges that are influenced by various social determinants, but the implementation of intersectoral action focusing on health promotion is still arbitrary. On the policy level, little is known about HiAP in other government ministries. Many health-related collaborations exist under the concept of intersectoral collaboration, which is prominent in the country’s development framework – Vision 2030 – but with no specific reference to HiAP. Under the political stream, the study highlights that political commitment from the highest office would facilitate mainstreaming the HiAP strategy, e.g. by setting up a department under the President’s Office. The budgeting process and planning for the Sustainable Development Goals were found to be potential windows of opportunity.

Conclusion: While HiAP is being adopted as policy in Kenya, it is still perceived by many stakeholders as the business of the health sector, rather than a policy for the whole government and beyond. Kenya’s Vision 2030 should use HiAP to foster progress in all sectors with health promotion as an explicit goal.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Health Research Policy and Systems
Volume: 17
Number: 15
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 01 Apr 2019 07:52
Date: 2019
ISSN: 1478-4505
Page Range: pp. 1-12
Faculties / Institutes: The Faculty of Economics and Social Studies > Institute of Political Science
Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Institut für Public Health (IPH)
DDC-classification: 300 Social sciences
610 Medical sciences Medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords: Health in all policies, intersectoral collaboration, agenda-setting, social determinants of health, Kenya
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative