Oechssler, Jörg and Roider, Andreas and Schmitz, Patrick W.
![[img]](http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF, English
Download (361Kb) | Terms of use |
Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the persistent URL or the URN below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.
Abstract
Negotiations frequently end in conflict after one party rejects a final offer. In a large-scale internet experiment, we investigate whether a 24-hour cooling-off period leads to fewer rejections in ultimatum bargaining. We conduct a standard cash treatment and a lottery treatment, where subjects receive lottery tickets for several large prizes - emulating a high-stakes environment. In the lottery treatment, unfair offers are less frequently rejected, and cooling-off significantly reduces the rejection rate further. In the cash treatment, rejections are more frequent and remain so after cooling-off. This treatment difference is particularly pronounced for subjects with lower cognitive abilities.
| Item Type: | Working paper |
|---|---|
| Date: | 2008 |
| Faculties / Institutes: | The Faculty of Economics and Social Studies > Alfred-Weber-Institut for Economics |
| Subjects: | 330 Economics |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | negotiations , ultimatum game , emotions , cooling-off , cognitive abilities , behavioral biases , internet experiment |
| Schriftenreihe ID: | Discussion Paper Series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics |
