Direkt zum Inhalt
  1. Publizieren |
  2. Suche |
  3. Browsen |
  4. Neuzugänge rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Rechtsfragen |
  7. EnglishCookie löschen - von nun an wird die Spracheinstellung Ihres Browsers verwendet.

External validation of molecular subtype classifications of colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability, CIMP, BRAF and KRAS

Alwers, Elizabeth ; Bläker, Hendrik ; Walter, Viola ; Jansen, Lina ; Kloor, Matthias ; Arnold, Alexander ; Sieber-Frank, Julia ; Herpel, Esther ; Tagscherer, Katrin E. ; Roth, Wilfried ; Chang-Claude, Jenny ; Brenner, Hermann ; Hoffmeister, Michael

In: BMC Cancer, 19 (2019), Nr. 681. S. 1-10. ISSN 1471-2407

[thumbnail of 12885_2019_Article_5842.pdf] PDF, Englisch - Hauptdokument
Download (822kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragExternal validation of molecular subtype classifications of colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability, CIMP, BRAF and KRAS von Alwers, Elizabeth ; Bläker, Hendrik ; Walter, Viola ; Jansen, Lina ; Kloor, Matthias ; Arnold, Alexander ; Sieber-Frank, Julia ; Herpel, Esther ; Tagscherer, Katrin E. ; Roth, Wilfried ; Chang-Claude, Jenny ; Brenner, Hermann ; Hoffmeister, Michael steht unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0

Zitieren von Dokumenten: Bitte verwenden Sie für Zitate nicht die URL in der Adresszeile Ihres Webbrowsers, sondern entweder die angegebene DOI, URN oder die persistente URL, deren langfristige Verfügbarkeit wir garantieren. [mehr ...]

Abstract

Background: Competing molecular classification systems have been proposed to complement the TNM staging system for a better prediction of survival in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, validation studies are so far lacking. The aim of this study was to validate and extend previously published molecular classifications of CRC in a large independent cohort of CRC patients.

Methods: CRC patients were recruited into a population-based cohort study (DACHS). Molecular subtypes were categorized based on three previously published classifications. Cox-proportional hazard models, based on the same set of patients and using the same confounders as reported by the original studies, were used to determine overall, cancer-specific, or relapse-free survival for each subtype. Hazard ratios and confidence intervals, as well as Kaplan-Meier plots were compared to those reported by the original studies.

Results: We observed similar patterns of worse survival for the microsatellite stable (MSS)/BRAF-mutated and MSS/KRAS-mutated subtypes in our validation analyses, which were included in two of the validated classifications. Of the two MSI subtypes, one defined by additional presence of CIMP-high and BRAF-mutation and the other by tumors negative for CIMP, BRAF and KRAS-mutations, we could not confirm associations with better prognosis as suggested by one of the classifications. For two of the published classifications, we were able to provide results for additional subgroups not included in the original studies (men, other disease stages, other locations).

Conclusions: External validation of three previously proposed classifications confirmed findings of worse survival for CRC patients with MSS subtypes and BRAF or KRAS mutations. Regarding MSI subtypes, other patient characteristics such as stage of the tumor, may influence the potential survival benefit. Further integration of methylation, genetic, and immunological information is needed to develop and validate a comprehensive classification that will have relevance for use in clinical practice.

Dokumententyp: Artikel
Titel der Zeitschrift: BMC Cancer
Band: 19
Nummer: 681
Verlag: BioMed Central ; Springer
Ort der Veröffentlichung: London ; Berlin, Heidelberg
Erstellungsdatum: 13 Aug. 2019 09:00
Erscheinungsjahr: 2019
ISSN: 1471-2407
Seitenbereich: S. 1-10
Institute/Einrichtungen: Zentrale und Sonstige Einrichtungen > Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg und Uniklinikum > Pathologisches Institut
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin
Freie Schlagwörter: Colorectal cancer, Molecular subtypes, Cancer-specific survival, External validation
Leitlinien | Häufige Fragen | Kontakt | Impressum |
OA-LogoDINI-Zertifikat 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative