Yule, Paul
![]() |
PDF, English
Download (1MB) | Terms of use |
For citations of this document, please do not use the address displayed in the URL prompt of the browser. Instead, please cite with one of the following:
Abstract
In light of modern aesthetic thought, the idea of a linear development in OSA from good to bad in terms of artistic merit can and must be seen in a far more differentiated way than previously. During the Enlightment, in fact the main ontological model consisted of birth, maturity and decline. Nowadays, however, biological 'decline' is ameliorated analogously by means of a variety of options. Moreover, the post-modern historiographic movement inveighs against primitive evolutionary schemes in history. Historic and art historic parallels offer themselves between Late Antiquity in the Roman World and in Old South Arabia. The probable destruction of Zafar, during the mid 6th century, provides a terminus post quem for our topic.
Document type: | Article |
---|---|
Date: | 2007 |
Version: | Primary publication |
Date Deposited: | 11 Sep 2008 15:26 |
Faculties / Institutes: | Research Project, Working Group > Individuals |
DDC-classification: | Italic Latin |
Controlled Keywords: | Zafar, Himyar, Kunst, Historiographie, Dekadenz |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Altsüdarabien , postmoderne Historiographiedecadence , Himyarite art , Old South Arabia , post-modern historiography , Zafar |
Subject (classification): | History of the ancient world to ca. 499 |
Countries/Regions: | Other parts of ancient world (Antiquity) |
Paper series: | Series Volume |