Oechssler, Jörg ; Roomets, Alex
Preview |
PDF, English
- main document
Download (466kB) | Terms of use |
Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.
Abstract
Two partners try to dissolve a partnership that owns an asset of ambiguous value, where the value is determined ex post by a draw from an Ellsberg urn. In a within-subject experiment, subjects make decisions in three different bargaining mechanisms: unstructured bargaining, the Texas shoot-out, and a K + 1 auction. We find that the K +1 auction is the most e¢ cient mechanism, which is in line with theory. Free format bargaining yields a surprising number of disagreements, which are not usually observed when the partnership has a certain or risky value.
Document type: | Working paper |
---|---|
Series Name: | Discussion Paper Series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics |
Volume: | 0733 |
Place of Publication: | Heidelberg |
Date Deposited: | 22 Sep 2023 14:09 |
Date: | September 2023 |
Number of Pages: | 34 |
Faculties / Institutes: | The Faculty of Economics and Social Studies > Alfred-Weber-Institut for Economics |
DDC-classification: | 330 Economics |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | bargaining, ambiguity, experiment |
Series: | Discussion Paper Series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics |