Zöllner, Frank
In: Kritische Berichte, 37 (2009), Nr. 1. pp. 146-157
 |
Online-Ressource, German http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-kb-182163 |
For citations of this document, please do not use the address displayed in the URL prompt of the browser. Instead, please cite with one of the following:
Abstract
This article presents a detailed analysis of the absurd interpretations of Leonardo da Vinci's works in Dan Brown's bestseller ‘Sacrileg’ (The da Vinci Code). However, Brown's approach finds striking parallels in the hermeneutical practice of serious scholarship. Examples analyzed include Leonardo's Virgin of the Rocks, his Mona Lisa and his drawing of the so-called Vitruvian Man, as well as Piero della Francesca's Flagellation of Christ and Aby Warburg's Bilderatlas Mnemosyne.
| Document type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Version: | Secondary publication |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Oct 2016 13:39 |
| Faculties / Institutes: | Research Project, Working Group > Individuals |
| DDC-classification: | Painting |
| Controlled Keywords: | Brown, Dan / The Da Vinci code, Populärwissenschaftliche Darstellung, Malerei <Motiv> |
| Subject (classification): | Artists, Architects Iconography Painting |
| Countries/Regions: | Italy |
| Paper series: | Series Volume |
